4.7 Article

Empirical model for substrate resistivity influence on MEMS capacitive accelerometer performance

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL
Volume 358, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2023.114422

Keywords

MEMS; Accelerometer; Doping concentration; Capacitive; Pull in voltage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, an empirical model was developed to predict the impact of substrate resistivity on MEMS capacitive accelerometer parameters, including rest capacitance, offset, output noise and scale factor. A stability analysis was also conducted to analyze the influence of substrate doping concentration on the performance of MEMS capacitive accelerometers. The experimental results showed a good agreement with the model predictions.
Resistivity of the substrate is a key parameter in designing MEMS devices and affects the device performance. Yet, the effects of this parameter on capacitive MEMS accelerometer performance hasn't gotten enough research. In this paper an empirical model for predicting the substrate resistivity impact on MEMS capacitive accelerometer parameters has been developed which include rest capacitance, offset, output noise and scale factor. Also, a stability analysis of MEMS capacitive accelerometer as a function of the substrate's doping concentration was modeled, simulated and then verified by fabricating a z-axis capacitive accelerometer. In the experiment, the rest measured capacitance of accelerometer's top plate was 11.50 pF in positive voltages and 11.97 pF for negative voltages. Also, the rest measured capacitance of the bottom plate was 11.45 pF for a positive bias and 11.92 pF for a negative bias. The measured pull in voltage was -18 V. Overall, a good agreement between the model and experimental data was obtained. Finally, minimum required substrate doping concentration (MDC) was modeled for the best performance of MEMS capacitive accelerometers which is dependent on the accelerometer's application and resolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available