4.7 Article

PROFIT: Bayesian profile fitting of galaxy images

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 466, Issue 2, Pages 1513-1541

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw3039

Keywords

methods: data analysis; methods: statistical; techniques: photometric; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: statistics; galaxies: structure

Funding

  1. ESO Telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory [177.A-3016, 177.A-3017, 177.A-3018]
  2. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  5. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) [CE110001020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present PROFIT, a new code for Bayesian two-dimensional photometric galaxy profile modelling. PROFIT consists of a low-level C++ library (libprofit), accessible via a command-line interface and documented API, along with high-level R (PROFIT) and PYTHON (PyProFit) interfaces (available at github.com/ICRAR/libprofit, github. com/ICRAR/ProFit, and github.com/ICRAR/pyprofit, respectively). R PROFIT is also available pre-built from CRAN; however, this version will be slightly behind the latest GitHub version. libprofit offers fast and accurate two-dimensional integration for a useful number of profiles, including Sersic, Core-Sersic, broken-exponential, Ferrer, Moffat, empirical King, point-source, and sky, with a simple mechanism for adding new profiles. We show detailed comparisons between libprofit and GALFIT. libprofit is both faster and more accurate than GALFIT at integrating the ubiquitous Sersic profile for the most common values of the Sersic index n (0.5 < n < 8). The high-level fitting code PROFIT is tested on a sample of galaxies with both SDSS and deeper KiDS imaging. We find good agreement in the fit parameters, with larger scatter in best-fitting parameters from fitting images from different sources (SDSS versus KiDS) than from using different codes (PROFIT versus GALFIT). A large suite of Monte Carlo-simulated images are used to assess prospects for automated bulge-disc decomposition with PROFIT on SDSS, KiDS, and future LSST imaging. We find that the biggest increases in fit quality come from moving from SDSS-to KiDS-quality data, with less significant gains moving from KiDS to LSST.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available