4.6 Article

Quasi Real-Time Apple Defect Segmentation Using Deep Learning

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23187893

Keywords

apple defect segmentation; multispectral imaging; real-time deep learning; visual inspection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a deep learning approach for automated segmentation of apple defects is proposed. The method outperforms general-purpose deep learning architectures commonly used for segmentation tasks in terms of segmentation accuracy. Additionally, the proposed method has low computational cost and can be used for visual-based apple inspection.
Defect segmentation of apples is an important task in the agriculture industry for quality control and food safety. In this paper, we propose a deep learning approach for the automated segmentation of apple defects using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) based on a U-shaped architecture with skip-connections only within the noise reduction block. An ad-hoc data synthesis technique has been designed to increase the number of samples and at the same time to reduce neural network overfitting. We evaluate our model on a dataset of multi-spectral apple images with pixel-wise annotations for several types of defects. In this paper, we show that our proposal outperforms in terms of segmentation accuracy general-purpose deep learning architectures commonly used for segmentation tasks. From the application point of view, we improve the previous methods for apple defect segmentation. A measure of the computational cost shows that our proposal can be employed in real-time (about 100 frame-per-second on GPU) and in quasi-real-time (about 7/8 frame-per-second on CPU) visual-based apple inspection. To further improve the applicability of the method, we investigate the potential of using only RGB images instead of multi-spectral images as input images. The results prove that the accuracy in this case is almost comparable with the multi-spectral case.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available