4.5 Article

Saudi Arabia research: academic insights and trend analysis

Journal

SCIENTOMETRICS
Volume 128, Issue 10, Pages 5595-5627

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-023-04797-0

Keywords

Bibliometrics; Research evaluation; Empirical analysis; Saudi Arabia; Saudi vision 2030

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bibliometric studies are used to assess the research performance of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) by analyzing scientific outputs and impacts using statistical methods. This study focuses on the most productive universities in KSA and examines their research profile in terms of productivity, scientific impact, and collaboration dimensions. The study evaluates KSA's scientific activities from 2011 to 2020, identifies the most productive universities, analyzes research trends, and explores different collaboration patterns to understand future research directions in KSA. The implications of this study are to provide evidence-based insights for researchers and policymakers.
Bibliometric studies are increasingly employed for research assessment by using statistical methods to analyze scientific outputs and impacts. The main objective of this study is to investigate the research performance of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) with a focus on KSA's most productive universities. The study describes the research profile of KSA in terms of productivity, scientific impact, and collaboration dimensions. We evaluated the scientific activities of KSA from the period 2011 to 2020 and identified the most productive universities by considering the average national production, analyzing data year by year and identifying research trends. In addition, we examined and compared different collaboration patterns in KSA to understand researchers' directions and interests in possible national areas of research going forward. The implication of our study is to provide evidence-based highlights (empirical pieces of evidence) to researchers and policymakers through our analyses of research in KSA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available