4.7 Review

How does Life Cycle Assessment capture the environmental impacts of A review

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 890, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164094

Keywords

Food system; Environmental outcome; Systematic review; Silvopasture; Agrosilviculture; Agrosilvopasture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the application of environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in agroforestry in the context of food systems is systematically reviewed. The findings reveal that most of the studies are conducted in tropical climates with limited consideration of post-farm gate system boundaries. Methodological issues include limited system boundaries, few impact categories, and differing functional units and multifunctionality approaches. The effects of agroforestry systems on biodiversity, climate change mitigation, water, soil, pollination, and pest and disease are only partially documented or not analyzed in the LCA studies.
In this paper, a systematic review approach was used to evaluate how environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been applied in agroforestry in the context of food systems. This review was used as the basis for discussing method-ological issues in the LCA framework for agroforestry systems (AFS) and relevant environmental outcomes in the ag-roforestry literature. A total of 32 LCAs in 17 countries identified in four databases and spanning a decade form the basis for this paper. Studies were selected based on pre-defined inclusion criteria and followed established guidelines and a review protocol. Qualitative data were extracted and categorized into multiple themes. Results were quantita-tively synthesized for the four phases of the LCA for each individual agroforestry practice (i.e., based on its structural composition). Results showed that around half of the selected studies are located in tropical climates, the rest being in temperate climates, predominantly in Southern Europe. Studies primarily used a mass functional unit and rarely in-cluded post-farm gate system boundaries. Almost half of the studies account for multifunctionality, and most allocation methods were based on physical properties. Climate change had the greatest coverage from all impact categories with some variations within milk, meat, and crop production systems. Methodological issues were related to limited system boundaries, few impact categories, and differing functional units and multifunctionality approaches. The identified ef-fects of AFS on biodiversity, climate change mitigation, water, soil, pollination, and pest and disease were only par-tially documented or not analyzed in the LCA studies or the LCA framework. Gaps in knowledge and limitations of the present review were discussed. Further methodological improvements remain necessary to determine the net en-vironmental effects of food products resulting from individual AFS, especially within the area of multifunctionality, carbon sequestration, and biodiversity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available