4.7 Article

Exploring the relationship between urban flood risk and resilience at a high- resolution grid cell scale

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 893, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164852

Keywords

Urban surface water flooding; System performance; Risk-resilience interplay; Flood hotspots

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The assessment of flood risk and resilience in urban areas is becoming more important for effective flood management. This study investigates the relationship between flood risk and resilience at the grid cell level. A performance-based flood resilience metric is proposed, and flood risk is calculated considering multiple storm events. The results show a complex relationship between flood risk and resilience, with different land uses showing different levels of resilience for the same risk level.
The assessment of flood risk and resilience has become increasingly important in recent years for effective urban flood management. While flood resilience and risk are two distinct concepts with unique assessment metrics, there is lack of quantitative analysis and understanding of the relationship between them. This study aims to investigate this relationship at the grid cell level in urban areas. To assess flood resilience for high-resolution grid cells, this study proposes a performance-based flood resilience metric, which is calculated using the system performance curve based on flood duration and magnitude. Flood risk is calculated as the product of maximum flood depth and probability, considering multiple storm events. The case study of Waterloo in London, UK is analyzed using a two-dimensional cellular automata-based model CADDIES, which consists of 2.7 million grid cells (5 m x 5 m). The results indicate that over 2 % of grid cells have risk values exceeding 1. Furthermore, there is a 5 % difference in resilience values below 0.8 between the 200-year and 2000-year design rainfall events, specifically 4 % for the former and 9 % for the latter. Additionally, the results reveal a complex relationship between flood risk and resilience, though decreasing flood resilience generally leads to increasing flood risk. However, this relationship varies depending on the land cover type, with building, green land, and water body cells showing higher resilience for the same level of flood risk compared to other land uses such as roads and railways. Classifying urban areas into four categories, including high risk vs. low resilience, high risk vs. high resilience, low risk vs. low resilience, and low risk vs. high resilience, is crucial in identifying flood hotspots for intervention development. In conclusion, this study provides an in-depth understanding of the relationship between risk and resilience in urban flooding, which could help improve urban flood management. The proposed performance-based flood resilience metric and the findings from the case study of Waterloo in London could be valuable for decision-makers in developing effective flood management strategies in urban areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available