4.7 Article

nIFTy galaxy cluster simulations - II. Radiative models

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 459, Issue 3, Pages 2973-2991

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw800

Keywords

methods: numerical; galaxies: haloes; cosmology: theory; dark matter

Funding

  1. Instituto de Fisica Teorica (IFT-UAM/CSIC in Madrid) via the Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa Program [SEV-2012-0249]
  2. University of Western Australia Research Collaboration Award
  3. ARC Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) [CE110001020]
  4. ARC [DP130100117, DP140100198]
  5. MINECO (Spain) [AYA 2012-31101]
  6. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) in Spain [AYA2012-31101]
  7. Consolider-Ingenio Programme of the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN) [MultiDark CSD2009-00064]
  8. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP130100117, DP140100198, FT130100041]
  9. Kavli Foundation
  10. ERC
  11. STFC [ST/L000768/1]
  12. NSERC
  13. Canada Research Chairs programme
  14. CFI-NSRIT
  15. PRIN-MIUR - Italian Minister of University and Research
  16. PRIN-INAF
  17. INFN INDARK Grant
  18. 'Consorzio per la Fisica di Trieste'
  19. STFC Advanced Fellowship
  20. NSF [AST-1009811]
  21. NASA [ATP NNX11AE07G]
  22. NASA Chandra [GO213004B, TM4-15007X]
  23. Research Corporation
  24. SSimPL program
  25. Sydney Institute for Astronomy (SIfA) [DP130100117]
  26. SNF [PP00P2 128540/1]
  27. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) through the Severo Ochoa Program [MINECO SEV-2011-0187, AYA2013-46886-P]
  28. DFG Research Unit 1254 'Magnetisation of Interstellar and Intergalactic Media'
  29. DFG Cluster of Excellence 'Origin and Structure of the Universe'
  30. Jim Buckee Fellowship
  31. STFCs DiRAC initiative
  32. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)/ERC [278594-GasAroundGalaxies]
  33. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/M000966/1, ST/K000373/1, ST/P002307/1, ST/P002315/1, ST/M007073/1, ST/M006948/1, ST/L000768/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  34. STFC [ST/P002307/1, ST/L000695/1, ST/I004459/1, ST/M006948/1, ST/M007073/1, ST/I004459/2, ST/P002315/1, ST/L000768/1, ST/K000373/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have simulated the formation of a massive galaxy cluster (M-200(crit) = 1.1 x 10(15) h(-1) M-circle dot) in a Lambda cold dark matter universe using 10 different codes (RAMSES, 2 incarnations of AREPO and 7 of GADGET), modelling hydrodynamics with full radiative subgrid physics. These codes include smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH), spanning traditional and advanced SPH schemes, adaptive mesh and moving mesh codes. Our goal is to study the consistency between simulated clusters modelled with different radiative physical implementations - such as cooling, star formation and thermal active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback. We compare images of the cluster at z = 0, global properties such as mass, and radial profiles of various dynamical and thermodynamical quantities. We find that, with respect to non-radiative simulations, dark matter is more centrally concentrated, the extent not simply depending on the presence/absence of AGN feedback. The scatter in global quantities is substantially higher than for non-radiative runs. Intriguingly, adding radiative physics seems to have washed away the marked code-based differences present in the entropy profile seen for non-radiative simulations in Sembolini et al.: radiative physics + classic SPH can produce entropy cores, at least in the case of non cool-core clusters. Furthermore, the inclusion/absence of AGN feedback is not the dividing line - as in the case of describing the stellar content - for whether a code produces an unrealistic temperature inversion and a falling central entropy profile. However, AGN feedback does strongly affect the overall stellar distribution, limiting the effect of overcooling and reducing sensibly the stellar fraction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available