4.7 Article

Star formation in Galactic flows

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 459, Issue 2, Pages 1985-1992

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw791

Keywords

stars: formation; stars: luminosity function; mass function; galaxies: star formation

Funding

  1. European Research Council
  2. BIS National E-Infrastructure capital grant [ST/K000373/1]
  3. STFC DiRAC Operations grant [ST/K0003259/1]
  4. STFC [ST/G001987/1, ST/K000373/1, ST/M006948/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K000373/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the triggering of star formation in clouds that form in Galactic scale flows as the interstellar medium passes through spiral shocks. We use the Lagrangian nature of smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations to trace how the star-forming gas is gathered into self-gravitating cores that collapse to form stars. Large-scale flows that arise due to Galactic dynamics create shocks of the order of 30 km s(-1) that compress the gas and form dense clouds (n > several x 10(2) cm(-3)) in which self-gravity becomes relevant. These large-scale flows are necessary for creating the dense physical conditions for gravitational collapse and star formation. Local gravitational collapse requires densities in excess of n > 10(3) cm(-3) which occur on size scales of a parts per thousand 1 pc for low-mass star-forming regions (M < 100 M-aS (TM)), and up to sizes approaching 10 pc for higher mass regions (M > 10(3) M-aS (TM)). Star formation in the 250 pc region lasts throughout the 5 Myr time-scale of the simulation with a star formation rate of a parts per thousand 10(-1) M-aS (TM) yr(-1) kpc(-2). In the absence of feedback, the efficiency of the star formation per free-fall time varies from our assumed 100 per cent at our sink accretion radius to values of < 10(-3) at low densities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available