4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Observations of high-plasma density region in the inner coma of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko during early activity

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 462, Issue -, Pages S33-S44

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw2046

Keywords

plasmas; instrumentation: miscellaneous; methods: data analysis; comets: individual: 67P/C-G

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway [240000]
  2. Swedish National Space Board [109/12, 135/13]
  3. Vetenskapsradet [621-2013-4191]
  4. CNRS
  5. CNES
  6. Observatoire de Paris
  7. Universite Paul Sabatier, Toulouse

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 2014 September, as Rosetta transitioned to close bound orbits at 30 km from comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, the Rosetta Plasma Consortium Langmuir probe (RPC-LAP) data showed large systematic fluctuations in both the spacecraft potential and the collected currents. We analyse the potential bias sweeps from RPC-LAP, from which we extract three sets of parameters: (1) knee potential, that we relate to the spacecraft potential, (2) the ion attraction current, which is composed of the photoelectron emission current from the probe as well as contributions from local ions, secondary emission, and low-energy electrons, and (3) an electron current whose variation is, in turn, an estimate of the electron density variation. We study the evolution of these parameters between 4 and 3.2 au in heliocentric and cometocentric frames. We find on September 9 a transition into a high-density plasma region characterized by increased knee potential fluctuations and plasma currents to the probe. In conjunction with previous studies, the early cometary plasma can be seen as composed of two regions: an outer region characterized by solar wind plasma, and small quantities of pick-up ions, and an inner region with enhanced plasma densities. This conclusion is in agreement with other RPC instruments such as RPC-MAG, RPC-IES and RPC-ICA, and numerical simulations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available