4.6 Article

Cross-contamination in the kitchen: A model for quantitative microbiological risk assessment

Journal

RISK ANALYSIS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/risa.14232

Keywords

cross-contamination; modeling; QMRA; risk assessment; transfer fract ion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A quantitative microbiological risk assessment model for cross-contamination transmission in the kitchen was developed and used to simulate various scenarios. The study found that the cutting board-salad route was the most important transmission route, with the salad playing a major role in the final exposure. Interventions such as hand washing and replacing cutting boards and knives significantly reduced the fraction of bacteria ingested.
A quantitative microbiological risk assessment model for the cross-contamination transmission route in the kitchen (KCC) is presented. Bacteria are transmitted from contaminated (chicken) meat to hands, kitchen utensils, and other surfaces, subsequently contaminating a salad. The model aims to estimate the fraction of bacteria on the meat that is ingested due to cross-contamination, determine the importance of the different transmission routes, and assess the effect of scenarios (interventions) on the fraction ingested. The cross-contamination routes defined, bacterial source-to-recipient transfer fractions as available and derived from literature, and important characteristics (e.g., washing in cold water vs. hot water with soap) shaped the KCC model. With this model, 32 scenarios of an eight-step preparation of a meat and salad meal in a domestic kitchen were stochastically simulated. The cutting board-salad route proved dominant and the salad plays a major role in the final exposure. A realistic scenario (washing hands, cutting board, and knife with cold water after cutting the meat) estimates that a mean fraction of 3.2E - 3 of the bacteria on the meat is ingested. In the case of hand washing with hot water and soap and cutting board and knife replacement, the mean fraction ingested is 3.6E - 6. For a subsequent meal, where the contaminated sources were kitchen fomites, the estimated mean fraction is 4.3E - 4. In case of hamburger, part of the bacteria is unavailable for cross-contamination, resulting in a mean fraction ingested of about 5.4E - 5. The role of the dishcloth in cross-contamination transmission proved to be minor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available