4.7 Article

redMaGiC: selecting luminous red galaxies from the DES Science Verification data

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 461, Issue 2, Pages 1431-1450

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1281

Keywords

methods: statistical; techniques: photometric; galaxies: general

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  2. US Department of Energy
  3. US National Science Foundation
  4. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  6. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  7. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  8. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  9. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  10. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  11. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  12. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  13. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  14. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e Inovacao
  15. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  16. Collaborating Institutions in the Dark Energy Survey
  17. National Science Foundation [AST-1138766]
  18. MINECO [AYA2012-39559, ESP2013-48274, FPA2013-47986]
  19. Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa [SEV-2012-0234]
  20. European Research Council under the European Union [240672, 291329, 306478]
  21. Australian Astronomical Observatory [A/2013B/012]
  22. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  23. National Science Foundation
  24. US Department of Energy Office of Science
  25. University of Arizona
  26. Brazilian Participation Group
  27. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  28. University of Cambridge
  29. Carnegie Mellon University
  30. University of Florida
  31. French Participation Group
  32. German Participation Group
  33. Harvard University
  34. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  35. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  36. Johns Hopkins University
  37. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  38. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  39. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  40. New Mexico State University
  41. New York University
  42. Ohio State University
  43. Pennsylvania State University
  44. University of Portsmouth
  45. Princeton University
  46. Spanish Participation Group
  47. University of Tokyo
  48. University of Utah
  49. Vanderbilt University
  50. University of Virginia
  51. University of Washington
  52. Yale University
  53. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  54. Science and Technology Facilities Council [1244451, ST/M004708/1, ST/F001991/1, ST/N000668/1, ST/K00090X/1, ST/M001334/1, ST/I000879/1, ST/J001511/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  55. UK Space Agency [ST/N002679/1, ST/K003135/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  56. ICREA Funding Source: Custom
  57. STFC [ST/J001511/1, ST/I000879/1, ST/I000976/1, ST/M003574/1, ST/H001581/1, ST/M004708/1, ST/K00090X/1, ST/N000668/1, ST/M005305/1, ST/M001334/1, ST/N001087/1, ST/L006529/1, ST/F001991/1, ST/L000652/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  58. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  59. Division Of Physics [1125897] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  60. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  61. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1311924, 1536171, 1211838] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce redMaGiC, an automated algorithm for selecting luminous red galaxies (LRGs). The algorithm was specifically developed to minimize photometric redshift uncertainties in photometric large-scale structure studies. redMaGiC achieves this by self-training the colour cuts necessary to produce a luminosity-thresholded LRG sample of constant comoving density. We demonstrate that redMaGiC photo-zs are very nearly as accurate as the best machine learning-based methods, yet they require minimal spectroscopic training, do not suffer from extrapolation biases, and are very nearly Gaussian. We apply our algorithm to Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification (SV) data to produce a redMaGiC catalogue sampling the redshift range z is an element of [0.2, 0.8]. Our fiducial sample has a comoving space density of 10(-3) (h(-1) Mpc)(-3), and a median photo-z bias (z(spec) - z(photo)) and scatter (sigma(z)/(1 + z)) of 0.005 and 0.017, respectively. The corresponding 5 sigma outlier fraction is 1.4 per cent. We also test our algorithm with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 8 and Stripe 82 data, and discuss how spectroscopic training can be used to control photo-z biases at the 0.1 per cent level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available