3.9 Article

Level of knowledge on occupational asthma and asthmagens: Assessment among healthcare workers by a validated questionnaire

Journal

REVUE DES MALADIES RESPIRATOIRES
Volume 40, Issue 8, Pages 655-665

Publisher

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2023.06.003

Keywords

Occupational asthma; Knowledge; Questionnaire; Asthmogenic agents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the level of knowledge of healthcare workers on occupational asthma and asthmogenic agents and pave the way for effective educational action. The findings revealed knowledge gaps across professional categories, emphasizing the need for knowledge assessment and planned educational actions.
Introduction. - The health system is one of the professional sectors perhaps most at risk of occupational asthma. The aims of this study were to evaluate the level of knowledge of health care workers (HCWs) on occupational asthma and asthmogenic agents and to pave the way to effective educational action on the subject.Methods. - A multicenter transversal study including 180 HCWs was carried out between July and December 2020. A validated questionnaire addressed four dimensions: knowledge of asthmatic disease, knowledge of occupational asthma, knowledge of prognosis of occupational asthma and knowledge on the prevention of occupational asthma.Results. - The average total score was 13.71/18 (76.17%). There was no correlation between average total score and age, educational level, seniority or status of paramedical staff. Mean total scores were significantly higher for participants with no fixed work schedule and those practicing in non-university structures. The difficulty indexes for the four aforementioned dimensions were 82.22%, 77.56%, 53.52% and 66.67% respectively.Conclusions. - Knowledge gaps affect all professional categories but to different degrees. A review of the level of knowledge of persons in each category would be the first step on the road to planned educational action.(c) 2023 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available