4.7 Article

A hybrid optimization approach towards energy recovery from torrefied waste blends

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 212, Issue -, Pages 151-165

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.053

Keywords

Urban forest waste; Lignocellulosic biomass; Biofuel optimization; Torrefaction; Waste management; Response surface analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a hybrid approach based on multicriteria decision methods and response surface methodology to optimize the definition of urban forest waste (UFW) blends and their torrefaction. The approach involves assessing the properties of UFWs, defining an optimum blend based on feedstock properties, optimizing the torrefaction process, and validating the properties and combustion behavior of the torrefied optimum blend. The methodology provides a UFW blend with improved properties and higher combustion stability.
The bottleneck of urban forest waste (UFW) as biofuel relies on surpassing its logistical management, feedstock quantity and supply, heterogeneity, and property drawbacks. This article proposes a hybrid approach based on multicriteria decision methods (MCDM) and response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize the definition of UFW blends and their torrefaction (temperature and process time). First, proximate, ultimate, and calorific analysis of UFWs (S1.Mangifera indica, S2.Ficus benjamina, S3.Pelthophorum dubium, S4.Persea americana, S5. Anadenanthera colubrina, and S6.Tapirira guianensis) were assessed. Then, understanding that UFW relies on species that do not always show promising characteristics as biofuels, the MCDM was applied to feedstock properties defining an optimum blend (OB) composed of 73%, 12.5%, and 14.5% of S1, S5, and S6, respectively. Next, the OB torrefaction was optimized using a central composite design (RSM-CCD), providing prediction models, the optimum torrefaction condition (273.3 C and 40 min), and a torrefied optimum blend (TOB). Finally, the approach was validated by assessing TOB's properties, combustion behavior, and gaseous emissions. The methodology supplied a TOB with lower ash (2.67%), an HHV of 20.87 MJ kg-1, reduced nitrogen content (up to 39.65%), and more stable combustion resulting in a superior solid biofuel with a lower potential of NOemissions in further applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available