4.7 Article

Performance assessment of a parabolic trough solar collector using nanofluid and water based on direct absorption

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 214, Issue -, Pages 11-22

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.06.016

Keywords

Parabolic trough solar collector; Nano-fluids; Clean environment; solar energy; Heat transfer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this investigation, a parabolic trough solar collector with an evacuated tube was fabricated and analyzed. The collector's efficiency increased with the use of CuO-H2O nanofluid as the working fluid, and the efficiency also increased with the volume flow rate of the working fluid. The heat transfer coefficients were higher for the CuO-H2O nanofluid compared to water, and the efficiency increase for different nanoparticle's concentrations was observed.
In this investigation, a parabolic trough solar concentrating collector with an evacuated tube was fabricated with an aperture area, collector length, breadth, and rim angle, inner and outer diameter of absorber as 2.45 m2, 2.1 m, 1.2 m, 90 deg, 0.0286 m, and 0.03058 m, respectively. A copper oxide (CuO) and water-based nanofluid was employed as the working fluid. Different mass fractions (0.05%, 0.075%, and 0.1%) and volume flow rates (70 lit/hr and 140 lit/hr) of nanofluid were taken, and performance of an evacuated tube parabolic trough collector was analysed. When CuO-H2O nanofluid of varying concentrations (0.05%, 0.075%, and 0.1%) is used in place of H2O (DI), it has been observed that the solar collector's efficiency increases. The efficiency of the collector increases in direct proportion to the working fluid's volume flow rate increment. The maximum heat transfer coefficients for CuO-H2O based nanofluid were 280.68 W/m2-K and 466.8 W/m2-K while the maximum convective heat transfer coefficients for water as working fluid were 268.11 W/m2-K and 488.7 W/m2-K at 70 lit/ h and 140 lit/h, respectively. An efficiency increase of 45.15%, 51.19% and 53.26% for 70 lit/h and 59.61%, 63.56% and 69.07% for 140 lit/h mass flow rate has been observed for different nanoparticle's concentrations, respectively. Economic studies showed that the cost of the experiment (for 0.05% CuO dispersion) has increased by 1.08% for 70 lit/h mass flow rate when compared to the water based direct cooling method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available