4.5 Article

Effects of high-flux hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration on the mortality of patients with end-stage kidney disease: a meta-analysis

Journal

RENAL FAILURE
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2147436

Keywords

High-flux hemodialysis; hemodiafiltration; end-stage kidney disease; survival outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effects of high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF) on the survival of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. The results showed that HFHD has no significant impact on the overall mortality and cardiovascular mortality of ESKD patients compared to HDF, but it can reduce the risk of infection-related death.
Background High-flux hemodialysis (HFHD) is widely used in hemodialysis centers and is the mode of hemodialysis actively recommended by the guidelines. Additionally, hemodiafiltration (HDF) is widely used in clinical practice. However, there are some inconsistencies in the results of studies on the effects of HDF and HFHD, which has caused controversy regarding which of these two dialysis modalities to select. Objective To explore the effect of HFHD and HDF on the survival of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Methods A systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases was conducted, focusing on cohort studies and randomized controlled trials on hemodialysis in patients with ESKD using HFHD or HDF. A meta-analysis of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 software, and fixed and random effect models were applied according to the heterogeneity results. Results A total of 13 studies, including six cohort studies and seven randomized controlled trials, were included in the final analysis. The results revealed that HFHD had no statistically significant effect on the all-cause mortality (odds ratio (OR): 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86, 1.57) or cardiovascular mortality (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.64, 1.15) of patients with ESKD. However, compared with HDF, HFHD reduced the infection mortality rate (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.77). Conclusions Compared with HDF, HFHD has no obvious benefits for all-cause mortality or cardiovascular mortality in patients with ESKD, but reduced risk of infection-related death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available