4.7 Article

NLTE carbon abundance determination in selected A- and B-type stars and the interpretation of C I emission lines

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 462, Issue 1, Pages 1123-1135

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1635

Keywords

line: formation; stars: abundances

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [16-32-00695, 15-02-06046]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We constructed a comprehensive model atom for C I-C II using the most up-to-date atomic data available and evaluated the non-local thermodynamic equilibrium (NLTE) line formation for C I and C II in classical 1D models representing the atmospheres of A-and late B-type stars. Our NLTE calculations predict the emission that appears at effective temperature of 9250 to 10 500 K depending on log g in the C I 8335, 9405 angstrom singlet lines and at T-eff > 15 000 K (log g = 4) in the C I 9061-9111 angstrom, 9603-9658 angstrom triplet lines. A pre-requisite of the emission phenomenon is the overionization-recombination mechanism resulting in a depopulation of the lower levels of C I to a greater extent than the upper levels. Extra depopulation of the lower levels of the transitions corresponding to the near-infrared lines, is caused by photon loss in the UV lines C I 2479, 1930, and 1657 angstrom. We analysed the lines of C I and C II in Vega, HD 73666, Sirius, 21 Peg, pi Cet, HD 22136, and. Her taking advantage of their observed high-resolution spectra. The C I emission lines were detected in the four hottest stars, and they were well reproduced in our NLTE calculations. For each star, the mean NLTE abundances from lines of the two ionization stages, C I and C II, including the C I emission lines, were found to be consistent. We show that the predicted C I emission phenomenon depends strongly on whether accurate or approximate electron-impact excitation rates are applied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available