4.6 Article

System characterization and performance studies with MACACO III Compton camera

Journal

RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 208, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2023.110922

Keywords

Compton camera; Scintillator crystals; Silicon photomultipliers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The IRIS group of IFIC-Valencia has developed a Compton camera prototype with improved detection performance using Lanthanum (III) bromide scintillator crystals coupled to silicon photomultipliers. The 25 μm photodetector showed better energy resolution and angular resolution, as well as stability with temperature variations, compared to the 50 μm photodetector. The system's imaging capabilities and performance were also evaluated through studies with point-like sources and simulations.
The IRIS group of IFIC-Valencia has developed a Compton camera prototype. The system detectors are made of Lanthanum (III) bromide scintillator crystals coupled to silicon photomultipliers. Two models of silicon photomultipliers arrays with different micro pixel pitch (25 and 50 mu m) have been chosen as possible candidates to improve the response of the new system. Characterization studies with a 22Na point-like source have indicated that the 25 mu m photodetector provided better performance in terms of energy resolution (5.2% FWHM at 511 keV) and angular resolution (6.9 degrees FWHM at 1275 keV), and more stability with temperature variations. In addition, MACACO III imaging capabilities have been assessed using a structure composed of thirty-seven 22Na point-like sources. Furthermore, in order to evaluate possible ways of improving the system performance, several studies have been carried out by means of simulations both in realistic and performance improved conditions. In this work, the system performance is evaluated for its future application in different areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available