Plan robustness analysis for threshold determination of SGRT-based intrafraction motion control in 3DCRT breast cancer radiation therapy

Purpose The goal of this study was to obtain maximum allowed shift deviations from planning position in six degrees of freedom (DOF), that can serve as threshold values in surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) of breast cancer patients. Methods The robustness of conformal treatment plans of 50 breast cancer patients against 6DOF shifts was investigated. For that, new dose distributions were calculated on shifted computed tomography scans and evaluated with respect to target volume and spinal cord dose. Maximum allowed shift values were identified by imposing dose constraints on the target volume dose coverage for 1DOF, and consecutively, for 6DOF shifts using an iterative approach and random sampling. Results Substantial decreases in target dose coverage and increases of spinal cord dose were observed. Treatment plans showed highly differing robustness for different DOFs or treated area. The sensitivity was particularly high if clavicular lymph nodes were irradiated, for shifts in lateral, vertical, roll or yaw direction, and showed partly pronounced asymmetries. Threshold values showed similar properties with an absolute value range of 0.8 mm to 5 mm and 1.4 degrees to 5 degrees. ConclusionThe robustness analysis emphasized the necessity of taking differences between DOFs and asymmetrical sensitivities into account when evaluating the dosimetric impact of position deviations. It also highlighted the importance of rotational shifts, especially if clavicular lymph nodes were irradiated. A practical approach of determining 6DOF shift limits was introduced and a set of threshold values applicable for SGRT based patient motion control was identified.

Automated summary

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum allowed shift deviations in six degrees of freedom for surface guided radiation therapy of breast cancer patients. The robustness of treatment plans against 6DOF shifts was investigated, and threshold values were identified based on dose constraints. The study emphasized the need to consider differences between DOFs and asymmetrical sensitivities when evaluating the dosimetric impact of position deviations.