4.7 Article

Prehistoric and historic exploitation of marine mammals in the Black Sea

Journal

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 314, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2023.108210

Keywords

Anthropocene; Cetaceans; Dolphin; Porpoise; Black sea; Zooarchaeology; Baseline; Conservation; Exploitation; Megafauna

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By synthesizing zooarchaeological data from 27 sites around the Black Sea, researchers found that the exploitation of marine mammals in the Black Sea lasted for 8500 years from the Neolithic to the Medieval period. This suggests a longer history of human impact on the Black Sea marine fauna and pushes back the timeline of marine mammal exploitation.
The recent exploitation of marine species is relatively well documented and understood in terms of impacts on species abundance, distribution, and resource use. In contrast, ancient exploitation of marine mammals remains poorly documented; in part, because a detailed meta-analysis of their presence in the zooarchaeological record is lacking. This is true in the Black Sea, where cetaceans are reported in the zooarchaeological record but have not yet been studied comprehensively. Here, we synthesize all available published and unpublished zooarchaeological data from 27 sites around the Black Sea, dating from the Mesolithic and Neolithic periods (6500-6000 BCE) to the Medieval period (641e1475 CE), to document the extent and nature of the exploitation of the Black Sea cetacean species. The results suggest that cetacean exploitation was practised continuously in the Black Sea over a period of 8500 years from the Neolithic through to the Medieval period. This suggests a much longer history of marine mammal exploitation in the Black Sea than previously understood, pushing back the timeline of human impacts on the Black Sea marine fauna.& COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available