4.5 Article

An ecological momentary assessment study of affectively-charged motivational states and physical activity

Journal

PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102423

Keywords

Affectively-charged motivations; Physical activity; Ecological momentary assessment; Accelerometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that affectively-charged motivations for physical activity vary throughout the day and are associated with different levels of activity intensity. People tend to have lower affective motivations in the morning and at random times, but higher motivations for planned activity and in the evening. Importantly, individuals with higher morning affective motivations engage in more moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.
The physical activity (PA) intention-behavior gap has prompted researchers to explore other explanatory factors such as affective mechanisms which might better explain PA engagement. Affectively-charged motivations (e.g., desire, dread) are thought to influence the pursuit or avoidance of future behavior. This study examined whether affectively-charged motivations for PA changed across the day and were differentially associated with PA intensity. Participants (N = 60) wore ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers and answered EMA (M = 134.7 prompts/ person) about affectively-charged motivations for upcoming PA using a 0-to-100-point scale (dread-excitement) in the morning, pre-activity, at-random, and evening for 14 days. Affectively-charged motivations for PA were lower in the morning and at-random compared to pre-activity (p = .004) and evening (p < .001). On average, individuals who rated morning affectively-charged motivations for PA 10-points higher engaged in 28 additional min/week of moderate-to-vigorous PA (p = .048). These findings suggest that affectively-charged motivations occurring in the morning may have greater salience for PA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available