4.7 Article

Development of the PREMIUM computerized adaptive testing for measuring the access and care coordination for patients with severe mental illness

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 328, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115444

Keywords

Patient-reported experience measures; Health services research; Mental health; Psychiatry; Schizophrenia; Bipolar disorders; Major depressive disorders

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) tool to measure the experience of SMI patients with access and care coordination. The tool showed good psychometric properties and was suitable for clinical use, with no significant differential functioning based on sex, age, care setting, and diagnosis. Its use can optimize patient care pathways and transition towards more person-centered healthcare.
Severe mental illness (SMI) patients often have complex health needs, which makes it difficult to access and coordinate their care. This study aimed to develop a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) tool, PREMIUM CATACC, to measure SMI patients' experience with access and care coordination. This multicenter and cross-sectional study included 496 adult in- and out-patients with SMI (i.e., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder). Psychometric analysis of the 13-item bank showed adequate properties, with preliminary evidence of external validity and no substantial differential item functioning for sex, age, care setting, and diagnosis, making it suitable for CAT administration. A post-hoc CAT simulation demonstrated that the tool was efficient and accurate, with an average of seven items, compared to the full item bank administration. Its use by clinicians can contribute to optimizing patient care pathways and transitioning towards more person-centered healthcare.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available