4.7 Article

National trends in psychotropic medication prescribing before and during the COVID-19 pandemic*

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 325, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115248

Keywords

Psychotropic medication; Mental health; COVID-19

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines trends in psychotropic medication prescriptions during the COVID-19 pandemic using a national multi-payer pharmacy claims database. The study finds a decline in prescriptions during the early months of the pandemic, but a significant growth later on. It also highlights the increasing role of public insurance programs in financing psychotropic medication use during the pandemic.
The early months of the COVID-19 pandemic saw a decline in psychotropic medication use; however, little is known about how this trend evolved as the pandemic progressed and how it varied across different payers in the United States. Using a national multi-payer pharmacy claims database and adopting a quasi-experimental research design, this study examines trends in psychotropic medication prescriptions dispensed from July 2018 -June 2022. The study finds that the number of patients with dispensed psychotropic medications and the number of psychotropic medications dispensed declined during the early months of the pandemic but experi-enced a statistically significant growth in later periods compared to the pre-pandemic rate. Average days supply of psychotropic medications dispensed increased significantly throughout the pandemic. Commercial insurance remained the primary payer for psychotropic medication during the pandemic, but there was a significant in-crease in the number of prescription fills covered under Medicaid. This implies that public insurance programs played an increasing role in financing psychotropic medication use during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available