4.7 Article

COVID-19 lockdown, genetic ADHD susceptibility, and mental health in 10-year-old children

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 329, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115481

Keywords

Epidemiology; Genetics; Neuropsychology; ADHD

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses deep neuropsychiatric phenotyping to investigate the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on the mental health outcomes of children. The results suggest that the lockdown has negative consequences for the mental health of children, especially those with a genetic vulnerability to ADHD.
Previous studies report that the COVID-19 lockdown had an impact on the mental health of the pediatric population. In this study, we harness the deep neuropsychiatric phenotyping of the population-based COPSAC2010 (n = 700) cohort at age 10 to study the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on mental health outcomes with focus on the role of the genetic vulnerability to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), in the form of polygenic risk scores (PRS). A total of 593 children were examined between 2019 and 2021, resulting in two groups of different children, those evaluated before the lockdown (n = 230) and those evaluated after (n = 363). Children assessed after the lockdown presented higher odds of being diagnosed with ADHD and had significantly higher scores in most neuropsychiatric scales, particularly in subscales pertaining to behavior and attention problems. We observed a significant interaction between the lockdown and ADHD PRS on several neuropsychiatric dimensions, with a large post-lockdown increase in children with a high PRS, while there was little to no pre-post difference in children with low PRS. These results indicate mental health consequences of the lockdown in children and suggest that genetically susceptible individuals are more affected by such stressors in childhood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available