4.6 Article

Global analysis of kinetics reveals the role of secondary nucleation in recombinant spider silk self-assembly

Journal

PROTEIN SCIENCE
Volume 32, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pro.4722

Keywords

fibrils; recombinant protein; secondary nucleation; self-assembly; spider silk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recombinant spider silk proteins can be produced in large-scale fermentation processes and have proven to be valuable biomaterials for various applications. The self-assembly of these proteins into nanofibrils, which have unique properties, is essential for the creation of micro- and nanostructured scaffolds. However, understanding the molecular mechanisms behind nanofibril self-assembly remains a challenge.
Recombinant spider silk proteins can be prepared in scalable fermentation processes and have been proven as sources of biomaterials for biomedical and technical applications. Nanofibrils, formed through the self-assembly of these proteins, possess unique structural and mechanical properties, serving as fundamental building blocks for the fabrication of micro- and nanostructured scaffolds. Despite significant progress in utilizing nanofibrils-based morphologies of recombinant spider silk proteins, a comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms of nanofibrils self-assembly remains a challenge. Here, a detailed kinetic study of nanofibril formation from a recombinant spider silk protein eADF4(C16) in dependence on the protein concentration, seeding, and temperature is provided. For the global fitting of kinetic data obtained during the fibril formation, we utilized the online platform AmyloFit. Evaluation of the data revealed that the self-assembly mechanism of recombinant spider silk is dominated by secondary nucleation. Thermodynamic analyses show that both primary and secondary nucleations, as well as the elongation step of the eADF4(C16), are endothermic processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available