4.8 Article

Investing in mini- livestock production for food security and carbon neutrality in China

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2304826120

Keywords

insect; greenhouse gas emission; protein; food security; mitigation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Boosting the production of insects and earthworms based on food waste and livestock manure can contribute to China's food security and carbon neutrality goals, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and dependence on feed protein imports.
Future food farming technology faces challenges that must integrate the core goal of keeping the global temperature increase within 1.5 degrees C without reducing food security and nutrition. Here, we show that boosting the production of insects and earthworms based on food waste and livestock manure to provide food and feed in China will greatly contribute to meeting the country's food security and carbon neutrality pledges. By substituting domestic products with mini- livestock (defined as earthworms and insects produced for food or feed) protein and utilizing the recovered land for bioenergy production plus carbon capture and storage, China's agricultural sector could become carbon- neutral and reduce feed protein imports to near zero. This structural change may lead to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 2,350 Tg CO2eq per year globally when both domestic and imported products are substituted. Overall, the success of mini- livestock protein production in achieving carbon neutrality and food security for China and its major trading partners depends on how the substitution strategies will be implemented and how the recovered agricultural land will be managed, e.g., free use for afforestation and bioenergy or by restricting this land to food crop use. Using China as an example, this study also demonstrates the potential of mini- livestock for decreasing the environmental burden of food production in general.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available