4.8 Article

Large-scale land acquisitions exacerbate local farmland inequalities in Tanzania

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2207398120

Keywords

large-scale land acquisitions; inequality; land system science; causal inference

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Land inequality hinders economic development and perpetuates poverty, especially in the context of land acquisitions and control. A study conducted in Tanzania found that land acquisitions led to reduced landholdings and increased farmland inequality among smallholders. Households near these land acquisitions experienced a 21.1% decrease in landholdings, with suggestive evidence of declining farm sizes as well.
Land inequality stalls economic development, entrenches poverty, and is associated with the distributional outcomes of LSLAs. Using a household survey covering four pairs of land acquisition and control sites in Tanzania, we use a quasi- experimental design to characterize changes in land inequality and subsequent impacts on well- being. We find convincing evidence that LSLAs in Tanzania lead to both reduced landholdings and greater farmland inequality among smallholders. Households in proximity to LSLAs are associated with 21.1% (P = 0.02) smaller landholdings while evidence, although insignificant, is suggestive that farm sizes are also declining. Aggregate estimates, however, hide that households in the bottom quartiles of farm size suffer the brunt of landlessness and land loss induced by LSLAs that combine to generate greater farmland inequality. Additional analyses find that land inequality is not offset by improvements in other livelihood dimensions, rather farm size decreases among households near LSLAs are associated with no income improvements, lower wealth, increased poverty, and higher food insecurity. The results demonstrate that without explicit consideration of distributional outcomes, land- use policies can systematically reinforce existing inequalities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available