4.7 Review

Review of microplastic degradation: Understanding metagenomic approaches for microplastic degrading organisms

Journal

POLYMER TESTING
Volume 128, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108223

Keywords

Microplastics; Toxicity; Metagenomic analysis; Microorganisms; Enzymatic degradation; Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) degradation; mechanism; Macroplastics; Polyesters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review focuses on the environmental problems caused by plastic pollution and the application of metagenomics in understanding plastic biodegradation. It discusses the methodology, analysis, and comparison of plastic-degrading bacteria, and highlights the potential impact on soil, water, air quality, and human health. It also provides possible solutions such as using biodegradable materials and implementing recycling programs. The review emphasizes the potential of metagenomics in developing sustainable solutions to plastic pollution.
Environmental problems caused by plastic pollution are among the most pressing issues of our time. In recent years, metagenomics has become a powerful tool for understanding the microbial communities responsible for plastic biodegradation. In this review, recent developments and trends in metagenomics are discussed, and a comprehensive overview of the metagenomic methodology, analysis, and comparison of plastic-degrading bacteria is provided. In addition, the environmental consequences of plastic degradation are discussed, such as the impact on soil, water, and air quality, as well as the potential health risks posed by ingesting and inhaling microplastics. Possible solutions to the plastic degradation problem, such as using biodegradable materials and implementing recycling programs, are also explained. This review highlights the potential impact of metagenomics on the development of sustainable solutions to plastic pollution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available