4.7 Article

Capillary non-Newtonian seepage model of unvulcanized rubber expressed by the four-parameter rheological flow

Journal

POLYMER TESTING
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108101

Keywords

Unvulcanized rubber; Four -parameter rheological flow; Single capillary; Non -Newtonian seepage model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Micro-bubbles and pores in a tire, caused by the seepage process of rubber, can compromise the tire's safety. Studying the seepage behavior of unvulcanized rubber in a single capillary, the researchers developed a seepage equation to explain the relationship between flow rate, process length, pressure, and pore diameter. The equation was validated and found to be accurate.
Micro-bubbles and pores in a tire, generated by the seepage process of rubber into steel cord, seriously degrade the safety of the tire in use. However, unclear seepage behavior of unvulcanized rubber while flowing into the interstice of steel cord makes it difficult to eliminate defects. Here, we studied the seepage behavior of unvulcanized rubber in a single capillary. When the four-parameter rheological flow was compared to the common shear rheological model, it was best suited to represent the rheological behavior of unvulcanized rubber because of its lowest variance. On this basis, the single capillary seepage equation of unvulcanized rubber was developed to interpret the relationship between the flow rate, process length, pressure, and pore diameter in a single capillary tube. And it was validated by the finite element analysis method with the four-parameter rheological equation as the material parameter; the accuracy of the single capillary seepage equation reached 99.95%. It lays a foundation for further exploring the seepage model under complex conditions such as variable aperture and multiple channels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available