4.7 Article

Interface failure identification of argon/nitrogen double plasma modified hybrid laminated para-aramid composites

Journal

POLYMER COMPOSITES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.27856

Keywords

failure identification; laminating sequences; mechanical property; para-aramid fiber composites; plasma modification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals the synergistic effect of argon/nitrogen double plasma alteration on the mechanical properties of para-aramid fiber/epoxy resin composites, and optimal modification parameters were obtained through acoustic emission monitoring and comparative analysis.
This work reveals the synergistic effect of argon/nitrogen double plasma alteration on the mechanical properties of para-aramid fiber/epoxy resin composites with various laminating sequences. Acoustic emission monitored interface failure during tensile, bending and fracture testing. A comparative analysis was conducted on the bending performance of the composites modified by argon/nitrogen double plasma and single plasma. The results showed that the synergistic effect of nitrogen and high-energy molecule argon optimized the modifying effect of argon/nitrogen double plasma. The optimal modification parameters obtained through fiber extraction testing analysis are power 200 W, time 120 s, and Ar/N-2 double gas flow rate of 12 sccm. After plasma treatment, twill weave modifies better than plain weave. The AE signal amplitude of PX1 is minimized during stretching. Due to the difference in internal bending stiffness of PX2, interface delamination failure is more likely to occur. The PX5 had greater fiber and matrix debonding failure between mode-II fracture tests due to the weak modification effect of plain weave and its difficulty in deformation. In ballistic testing, PX1 blocks impact force through fiber bundle stretching deformation, while PX4 is more brittle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available