Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.A scoping review on biomedical journal peer review guides for reviewers
Eunhye Song et al.
PLOS ONE (2021)
The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity
David Moher et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2020)
Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review
Cecilia Superchi et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2019)
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
Ketevan Glonti et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2019)
Journal editors' perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
Ketevan Glonti et al.
BMJ OPEN (2019)
Journals could share peer-review data
Flaminio Squazzoni et al.
NATURE (2017)
Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Rachel Bruce et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2016)
A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology
James Galipeau et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
Peer review: still king in the digital age
David Nicholas et al.
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2015)
Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials
Jigisha Patel
BMC MEDICINE (2014)
How should medical science change?
Sabine Kleinert et al.
LANCET (2014)
Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers
Adrian Mulligan et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)
Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals
Allison Hirst et al.
PLOS ONE (2012)
Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial
S Schroter et al.
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2004)
The peer-review process
F Rowland
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2002)
Share Paper
