Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Anxiety in women referred for colposcopy: a prospective observational study
Julia Wittenborn et al.
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS (2022)
Towards a data-driven system for personalized cervical cancer risk stratification
Geir Severin R. E. Langberg et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2022)
Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program
Diede L. Loopik et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2021)
Cost-effectiveness of HPV-based cervical screening based on first year results in the Netherlands: a modelling study
E. E. L. Jansen et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2021)
Reducing unnecessary referrals for colposcopy in hrHPV-positive women within the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: A modelling study
Sylvia Kaljouw et al.
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY (2021)
Is smoking an independent risk factor for developing cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Gera Nagelhout et al.
EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY (2021)
Stigma and cervical cancer prevention: A scoping review of the U. S. literature
Caryn E. Peterson et al.
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2021)
Women's Views on Multifactorial Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk-Stratified Screening: A Population-Based Survey from Four Provinces in Canada
Cynthia Mbuya-Bienge et al.
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE (2021)
UK Women's Views of the Concepts of Personalised Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Risk-Stratified Breast Screening: A Qualitative Interview Study
Charlotte Kelley-Jones et al.
CANCERS (2021)
A scoping review of the use of visual aids in health education materials for persons with low-literacy levels
Njabulo Mbanda et al.
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING (2021)
Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches
Virginia Braun et al.
COUNSELLING & PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH (2021)
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
Virginia Braun et al.
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY (2021)
Risk prediction of cervical abnormalities: The value of sociodemographic and lifestyle factors in addition to HPV status
Danielle van der Waal et al.
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE (2020)
Levels of anxiety and distress following receipt of positive screening tests in Australia's HPV-based cervical screening programme: a cross-sectional survey
Rachael Helen Dodd et al.
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS (2020)
Oral contraceptives use and risk of cervical cancer-A systematic review & meta-analysis
Smita Asthana et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY (2020)
Using pictures to convey health information: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects on patient and consumer health behaviors and outcomes
Danielle Schubbe et al.
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING (2020)
Cervical Cancer Screening: Past, Present, and Future
Sarah L. Bedell et al.
SEXUAL MEDICINE REVIEWS (2020)
Women's perceptions of personalized risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention: An international focus group study
Linda Rainey et al.
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY (2019)
A Natural Progression: Australian Women's Attitudes About an Individualized Breast Screening Model
Jocelyn Lippey et al.
CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH (2019)
Introduction of primary screening using high-risk HPV DNA detection in the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based cohort study
Clare A. Aitken et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2019)
Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening in Immunosuppressed Women Without HIV Infection
Anna-Barbara Moscicki et al.
JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE (2019)
A risk prediction model to allow personalized screening for cervical cancer
Michael B. Rothberg et al.
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL (2018)
How Do Women View Risk-Based Mammography Screening? A Qualitative Study
Xiaofei He et al.
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2018)
HPV and cofactors for invasive cervical cancer in Morocco: a multicentre case-control study
Mohamed Berraho et al.
BMC CANCER (2017)
An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research
Trisha Greenhalgh et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)
An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research
Trisha Greenhalgh et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2016)
Why We Don't Just Do It: Understanding the Intention-Behavior Gap in Lifestyle Medicine
Mark D. Faries
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINE (2016)
The blame game: Cervical cancer, knowledge of its link to human papillomavirus and stigma
Melissa A. Shepherd et al.
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH (2014)
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
Allison Tong et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE (2007)
Comparison of risk factors for invasive squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix:: Collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 8,097 women with squamous cell carcinoma and 1,374 women with adenocarcinoma from 12 epidemiological studies
Amy Berrington de Gonzalez et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER (2007)
The role of pictures in improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence
Peter S. Houts et al.
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING (2006)
Variables influencing anxiety of patients with abnormal cervical smears referred for colposcopy
RLM Bekkers et al.
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY (2002)
Environmental co-factors in HPV carcinogenesis
X Castellsagué et al.
VIRUS RESEARCH (2002)
Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review
CJ Armitage et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2001)
HPV co-factors related to the development of cervical cancer: results from a population-based study in Costa Rica
A Hildesheim et al.
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER (2001)
Share Paper
