4.5 Article

A novel, quantitative clot retraction assay to evaluate platelet function

Journal

PLATELETS
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/09537104.2023.2254403

Keywords

96-well; clot retraction; microplate assay; platelet additive solution; platelet aggregation; platelet function test; platelet products; platelet storage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study describes a 96-well-based clot retraction assay that allows for rapid measurement of platelet function and provides quantitative information. The assay is robust to different calcium concentrations and can predict factors affecting platelet function.
Blood platelets are crucial to prevent excessive bleeding following injury to blood vessels. Platelets are crucial for the formation of clots and for clot strength. Platelet activation involves aggregation, attachment to fibrin and clot retraction. Most assays that address platelet function measure platelet aggregation, not clot retraction. Here, we describe a 96-well-based clot retraction assay that requires a relatively short runtime and small sample volume. The assay involves continuous optical density monitoring of platelet-rich plasma that is activated with thrombin. The data can be analyzed using time-series analytical tools to generate quantitative information about different phases of clot formation and clot retraction. The assay demonstrated good repeatability and reproducibility and was robust to different calcium concentrations. Impairment of platelet bioenergetics, actin polymerization, fibrin interaction, and signaling significantly affected clot retraction and was detected and showed good agreement with light transmission aggregometry, suggesting that clot retraction is predictive of platelet function. Using this microplate clot retraction assay, we showed a significant difference in platelets stored in autologous plasma compared with platelet additive solution after 7 days of room temperature storage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available