Journal
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 35, Issue 11, Pages -Publisher
AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0174079
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Through the investigation of hypersonic shock wave/laminar boundary layer interaction, it is found that the shortcomings of thermochemical models are not the main reason for the discrepancies between simulations and experiments.
The state-of-the-art high-fidelity state-to-state (StS) model is performed to investigate the hypersonic shock wave/laminar boundary layer interaction over a 25(degrees)-55(degrees) double cone. This work aims to clarify whether the shortcomings of thermochemical models are the underlying source for the discrepancies between the simulations and experiments. A high-enthalpy nitrogen flow with a Mach number of 11.54 and a unit Reynolds number of 4.394 x 10( 5)/m is considered. We first find that the StS and widely used two-temperature models yield two different shock reflection patterns (i.e., the regular reflection and Mach reflection, respectively). However, the surface pressure and heat flux distributions predicted by the two models are generally consistent, which are not influenced by the differences in the shock patterns, dissociation rates, and non-Boltzmann vibrational distributions in the flowfields. Moreover, the StS model fails to match the experiments in spite of fairly limited improvement. Our findings indicate that the shortcomings of thermochemical models are not the main reason for the discrepancies in the simulations and experiments for the high-enthalpy nitrogen double-cone flow.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available