4.8 Article

Multiorbital Nature of Doped Sr2IrO4

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 131, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.036504

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The low-energy jeff = 1/2 band of Sr2IrO4 shows similarities with the x2 - y2 band of La2CuO4, but no superconductivity has been observed in Sr2IrO4 even after doping. The failures of the jeff = 1/2 picture may be the reason behind this. However, our reanalysis using the local-density approximation plus dynamical mean-field theory approach suggests that the jeff = 1/2 state remains stable upon doping, supporting the existence of the jeff = 1/2 picture. Additionally, we find that Sr2IrO4 is a multiorbital system due to the hybridization with the jeff = 3/2 orbitals, which affects the Mott gap and the behavior of holes in the system.
The low-energy jeff = 1/2 band of Sr2IrO4 bears stark resemblances with the x2 - y2 band of La2CuO4, and yet no superconductivity has been found so far by doping Sr2IrO4. Behind such a behavior could be inherent failures of the jeff = 1/2 picture, in particular when electrons or holes are introduced in the IrO2 planes. In view of this, here we reanalyze the jeff = 1/2 scenario. By using the local-density approximation plus dynamical mean-field theory approach, we show that the form of the effective jeff = 1/2 state is surprisingly stable upon doping. This supports the jeff = 1/2 picture. We show that, nevertheless, Sr2IrO4 remains in essence a multiorbital system: The hybridization with the jeff = 3/2 orbitals sizably reduces the Mott gap by enhancing orbital degeneracy, and part of the holes go into the jeff = 3/2 channels. These effects cannot be reproduced by a simple effective screened Coulomb repulsion. In the optical conductivity spectra, multiorbital processes involving the jeff = 3/2 states contribute both to the Drude peak and to relatively low-energy features.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available