4.4 Article

Measuring dose in lung identifies peripheral tumour dose inaccuracy in SBRT audit

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102632

Keywords

Dosimetry audit; SBRT; SABR; Stereotactic; Lung; Dose calculation; Algorithm; QA; Monte Carlo; Film dosimetry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents correction factors for dose measurements in a lung phantom, which showed inaccuracies of common dose calculation algorithms in soft tissue lung target, inhale lung material, and tissue interfaces. Monte Carlo based simulation was used to determine the correction factors and improved the measurement-to-plan dose discrepancy. The study concludes that dose calculation algorithms can underestimate dose at lung tumour/lung tissue interfaces and the application of correction factors is necessary.
Purpose: Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung tumours has become a mainstay of clinical practice worldwide. Measurements in anthropomorphic phantoms enable verification of patient dose in clinically realistic scenarios. Correction factors for reporting dose to the tissue equivalent materials in a lung phantom are presented in the context of a national dosimetry audit for SBRT. Analysis of dosimetry audit results is performed showing inaccuracies of common dose calculation algorithms in soft tissue lung target, inhale lung material and at tissue interfaces. Methods: Monte Carlo based simulation of correction factors for detectors in non-water tissue was performed for the soft tissue lung target and inhale lung materials of a modified CIRS SBRT thorax phantom. The corrections were determined for Gafchromic EBT3 Film and PTW 60019 microDiamond detectors used for measurements of 168 SBRT lung plans in an end-to-end dosimetry audit. Corrections were derived for dose to medium (Dm,m) and dose to water (Dw,w) scenarios. Results: Correction factors were up to-3.4% and 9.2% for in field and out of field lung respectively. Overall, application of the correction factors improved the measurement-to-plan dose discrepancy. For the soft tissue lung target, agreement between planned and measured dose was within average of 3% for both film and micro Diamond measurements. Conclusions: The correction factors developed for this work are provided for clinical users to apply to commissioning measurements using a commercially available thorax phantom where inhomogeneity is present. The end to-end dosimetry audit demonstrates dose calculation algorithms can underestimate dose at lung tumour/lung tissue interfaces by an average of 2-5%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available