4.7 Article

At-Home Versus Onsite COVID-19 School-based Testing: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-060352F

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine whether an at-home COVID-19 testing program could be as effective as an onsite testing program in middle school communities. Over a 21-week trial, it was found that participation rates and adherence to the weekly testing schedule were not inferior in at-home testing compared to onsite testing. Therefore, implementing at-home COVID-19 screening testing should be a routine prevention measure in schools nationwide, with adequate support to ensure participation and persistence in regular at-home testing.
OBJECTIVES Equitable access to coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) screening is important to reduce transmission and maintain in-person learning for middle school communities, particularly in disadvantaged schools. Rapid antigen testing, and at-home testing in particular, could offer substantial advantages over onsite testing from a school district's perspective, but it is unknown if engagement in at-home testing can be initiated and sustained. We hypothesized that an at-home COVID-19 school testing program would be noninferior to an onsite school COVID-19 testing program with regard to school participation rates and adherence to a weekly screening testing schedule. METHODS We enrolled 3 middle schools within a large, predominantly Latinx-serving, independent school district into a noninferiority trial from October 2021 to March 2022. Two schools were randomized to onsite and 1 school to at-home COVID-19 testing programs. All students and staff were eligible to participate. RESULTS Over the 21-week trial, at-home weekly screening testing participation rates were not inferior to onsite testing. Similarly, adherence to the weekly testing schedule was not inferior in the at-home arm. Participants in the at-home testing arm were able to test more consistently during and before returning from school breaks than those in the onsite arm. CONCLUSIONS Results support the noninferiority of at-home testing versus onsite testing both in terms of participation in testing and adherence to weekly testing. Implementation of at-home COVID-19 screening testing should be part of schools' routine COVID-19 prevention efforts nationwide; however, adequate support is essential to ensure participation and persistence in regular at-home testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available