4.4 Article

Atypical presentation of Pearson syndrome in an infant with suspected myelodysplastic syndrome

Journal

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-023-06114-6

Keywords

Anemia; Myelodysplastic syndrome; Fanconi syndrome; Mitochondrial DNA; Pearson syndrome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a case of a young girl who initially presented with severe anemia and was suspected of having myelodysplastic syndrome, but genetic testing results were negative. Further analysis led to a diagnosis of Pearson syndrome, a life-threatening condition associated with mitochondrial DNA abnormalities. The article emphasizes the importance of genetic testing and understanding the nature of mitochondrial disorders.
Background Anemia exhibits complex causation mechanisms and genetic heterogeneity. Some cases result in poor outcomes with multisystemic dysfunction, including renal tubulopathy. Early diagnosis is crucial to improve management. Case-diagnosis/treatment A 21-month-old female patient was admitted with severe anemia. Persistent neutropenia and dysplastic signs suggested myelodysplastic syndrome, but targeted gene panel results were negative. After multiple transfusions, spontaneous hematologic recovery was observed. At 4 years old, she presented failure to thrive, renal Fanconi syndrome, and severe metabolic acidosis. Differential diagnosis included Pearson syndrome (PS), a life-threatening condition associated with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), featuring anemia and pancreatic insufficiency. Further analysis revealed a similar to 7.5 kb mtDNA deletion. Until the age of 5, supportive care has been provided, without pancreatic insufficiency. Conclusions This PS case highlights the importance of genetic testing, even in the absence of typical features. Understanding the nature of mitochondrial disorders enables treatment tailoring and counseling about the prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available