4.7 Review

Review on the physicochemical treatments of rice husk for production of advanced materials

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 264, Issue -, Pages 899-935

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.056

Keywords

Rice husk ash (RHA); Silicon-based materials; Physicochemical treatments; Agricultural waste materials; Pyrolysis; Carbon active

Funding

  1. CONACYT (National Council of Science and Technology, in Mexico)
  2. Cinvestav IPN-Saltillo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, much attention has been focused on the utilization of plant biomass to produce engineering materials, encompassing the technological/scientific aspects as well as the economic, environmental and social issues. Amongst the variety of agricultural wastes or biomasses available, rice-husk (RH) occupies a preeminent position, not only in terms of its amount produced worldwide, but also because of its unique chemistry-related features. In this sense, some attempts have been made to produce advanced materials - including SiO2, SiC, Si3N4, elemental Si, Mg2Si and more recently, active carbon -, using RH. The production of those mentioned advanced materials depends largely on the treatments used (physical and/or chemical) and the reactions involved in the process, such as pyrolysis, carbothermal and reduction processes. In this contribution, a critical review on the processing and application of rice husks (RHs) for the production of various silicon-based materials and of active carbon is presented. The review addresses the different processing methods, the effects of various process parameters on the pyrolysis stage, the influence of physical, chemical and thermal treatments, activating conditions and activated carbon consolidation mechanisms. A flow chart with all the possible routes to produce SiO2 was purposely constructed. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available