4.7 Article

Inhibiting Notch Activity in Breast Cancer Stem Cells by Glucose Functionalized Nanoparticles Carrying γ-secretase Inhibitors

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 926-936

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2016.42

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [218062, 260599]
  2. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  3. Cancer Society of Finland
  4. Swedish Cultural Foundation of Finland
  5. Svensk-osterbottniska samfundet
  6. K. Albin Johansson foundation
  7. Liv och Halsa Foundation
  8. Magnus Ehrnrooth Foundation
  9. Waldemar von Frenckell Foundation
  10. Swedish Research Council
  11. EU (ITN NotchIT)
  12. Ulm University
  13. Norwegian Cancer Society [732200]
  14. Western health board of Norway (Helse Vest) [911182, 911789]
  15. Bergen Research Foundation
  16. Academy of Finland (AKA) [218062, 218062] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a challenge in cancer treatment due to their therapy resistance. We demonstrated that enhanced Notch signaling in breast cancer promotes self-renewal of CSCs that display high glycolytic activity and aggressive hormone-independent tumor growth in vivo. We took advantage of the glycolytic phenotype and the dependence on Notch activity of the CSCs and designed nanoparticles to target the CSCs. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles were functionalized with glucose moieties and loaded with a gamma-secretase inhibitor, a potent interceptor of Notch signaling. Cancer cells and CSCs in vitro and in vivo efficiently internalized these particles, and particle uptake correlated with the glycolytic profile of the cells. Nanoparticle treatment of breast cancer transplants on chick embryo chorioallantoic membranes efficiently reduced the cancer stem cell population of the tumor. Our data reveal that specific CSC characteristics can be utilized in nanoparticle design to improve CSC-targeted drug delivery and therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available