4.3 Article

Current Situation and Problems in Diagnosis of Early Chronic Pancreatitis

Journal

PANCREAS
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages E275-E281

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002252

Keywords

early chronic pancreatitis; endoscopic ultrasonography; pancreatic pain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed a low diagnostic rate of early chronic pancreatitis, especially in nonalcoholic cases, but slightly higher in cases presenting with pancreatic pain. The diagnostic rate was highest in the abdominal/back pain group. Further studies are needed to establish appropriate diagnostic criteria for ECP.
ObjectivesThe Japan Pancreas Society introduced the concept of early chronic pancreatitis (ECP) in 2009, but its epidemiology remains unclear. This study investigated challenges in ECP diagnosis.MethodsEarly chronic pancreatitis was diagnosed in 4 cohorts between April 2019 and November 2021 using the Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Chronic Pancreatitis 2019. These cohorts included patients with abdominal/back pain, abnormal pancreatic enzyme levels, ECP suspected due to other reasons, and those who underwent endoscopic ultrasonography for other diseases.ResultsA total of 2502 cases were analyzed and 150 (40 alcoholic and 110 nonalcoholic) cases with ECP findings on endoscopic ultrasonography were included. Early chronic pancreatitis was confirmed in 14 cases (9%), including 9 (22.5%) alcoholic and 5 (4.5%) nonalcoholic cases. Early chronic pancreatitis was confirmed in 15%, 0%, 2.2%, and 0.13% cases in the 4 cohorts, respectively. Early chronic pancreatitis was confirmed in 10 (48%) of the 21 (14%) cases with pancreatic pain.ConclusionsEarly chronic pancreatitis diagnostic rate was low, particularly in nonalcoholic cases, but was slightly higher in cases with pancreatic pain. The diagnostic rate was highest in the abdominal/back pain group. Further studies are required to establish appropriate diagnostic criteria for ECP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available