4.6 Review

OARSI year in review 2023: Rehabilitation and outcomes

Journal

OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
Volume 31, Issue 12, Pages 1534-1547

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.08.011

Keywords

Rehabilitation; Exercise; Education; Weight loss; Adjuncts; Review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this systematic review was to identify and compare different treatments for osteoarthritis, including core treatments, adjunct treatments, and multimodal treatments. The results showed that core treatments had modest benefits compared to no or minimal interventions. The majority of studies focused on knee OA and were not adequately powered to assess pain efficacy. Further research is needed to better understand the contextual effects, treatment responder characteristics, and treatment mechanisms of osteoarthritis.
Objective: We systematically reviewed the literature to identify comparative studies of core treatments (exercise, education, or weight management), adjunct treatments (e.g. electrotherapeutical modalities, bracing), or multimodal treatments (core plus other treatments), for treating osteoarthritis (OA) complaints, published between 1 March 2022 and 1 March 2023. Design: We searched three electronic databases for peer-reviewed comparative studies evaluating core treatments, adjunct treatments, or multimodal treatments for OA affecting any joint, in comparison to other OA treatments. Two authors independently screened records. Methodological quality was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. A narrative synthesis focusing on pain and function outcomes was performed in studies with a mean sample size of at least 46 participants per treatment arm. Results: 33 publications (28 studies), 82% with PEDro ratings of good or excellent, were eligible for narrative synthesis: 23 studies evaluated knee OA; one knee OA or chronic low back pain; two knee or hip OA; one hip OA only; and one thumb OA. No studies identified a dose, duration or type of exercise that resulted in better pain or function outcomes. Core treatments generally showed modest benefits compared to no or minimal intervention controls. Conclusions: Rehabilitation research continues to be focused on the knee. Most studies are not adequately powered to assess pain efficacy. Further work is needed to better account for contextual effects, identify treatment responder characteristics, understand treatment mechanisms, and implement guideline care. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Osteoarthritis Research Society International. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available