4.6 Article

Prevalence of oral infections in chronic kidney disease patients: A cross-sectional study

Journal

ORAL DISEASES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/odi.14663

Keywords

chronic apical periodontitis; chronic kidney disease; dialysis; endodontics; periodontal disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to analyze the prevalence of apical periodontitis and periodontal disease in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) patients and their relation to the treatment phase. The results showed that oral infections are more prevalent in advanced stages of CKD. Therefore, the treatment of periodontal disease and apical periodontitis should be considered in the treatment planning for CKD patients.
Objectives: The purpose of this investigation was to analyze the prevalence of apical periodontitis (AP) and periodontal disease (periodontitis) (PD) in Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in relation to their treatment phase. Subjects and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 188 patients with CKD were divided into two groups: patients without dialysis (WD group, n = 53) and patients on dialysis (DP group, n = 135). Panoramic radiographs were used to diagnose AP. The presence of periodontal disease was evaluated radiographically assessing alveolar bone loss. Student's t-test, chi-squared test, and logistic regression analysis were used to determine the significance of differences between groups. Results: In the WD group, 55% of patients had at least one tooth with AP, whereas in the DP group 67% had at least one tooth with AP (OR = 2.11; 95% CI = 1.09-4.08; p < 0.05). PD was more prevalent in the DP group (78%) than in the WD group (36%) (OR = 6.26; CI 95% = 3.13-12.52; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Oral infections are more prevalent in the advanced stages of CKD. The treatment of PD and AP should be incorporated in the treatment planning of patients with CKD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available