4.5 Article

An Immuno-Suppressive Aphid Saliva Protein Is Delivered into the Cytosol of Plant Mesophyll Cells During Feeding

Journal

MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS
Volume 29, Issue 11, Pages 854-861

Publisher

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-08-16-0168-R

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J0045531/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1100260, BBS/E/J/000C0623, BBS/E/J/000CA362, BB/N009169/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. BBSRC [BBS/E/J/000C0623, BBS/E/J/000CA362, BB/N009169/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herbivore selection of plant hosts and plant responses to insect colonization have been subjects of intense investigations. A growing body of evidence suggests that, for successful colonization to occur, (effector/virulence) proteins in insect saliva must modulate plant defense responses to the benefit of the insect. A range of insect saliva proteins that modulate plant defense responses have been identified, but there is no direct evidence that these proteins are delivered into specific plant tissues and enter plant cells. Aphids and other sap-sucking insects of the order Hemiptera use their specialized mouth parts (stylets) to probe plant mesophyll cells until they reach the phloem cells for long-term feeding. Here, we show, by immunogold-labeling of ultrathin sections of aphid feeding sites, that an immuno-suppressive aphid effector localizes in the cytoplasm of mesophyll cells near aphid stylets but not in cells further away from aphid feeding sites. In contrast, another aphid effector protein localizes in the sheaths composed of gelling saliva that surround the aphid stylets. Thus, insects deliver effectors directly into plant tissue. Moreover, different aphid effectors locate extracellularly in the sheath saliva or are introduced into the cytoplasm of plant cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available