4.5 Article

Smart glasses to monitor intraocular pressure using optical triangulation

Journal

OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 546, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2023.129752

Keywords

Intraocular pressure; Pressure sensing; Optical triangulation; Smart glasses; Glaucoma

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have developed a non-contact and non-invasive gadget in the form of wearable glasses for monitoring intraocular pressure. The gadget includes a laser source, miniaturized lenses and mirrors, a mask for structured illumination of the cornea, and a miniaturized camera. The pressure level is determined by observing the radius of curvature of the grid pattern on the cornea. Experimental results show a pressure measurement resolution of 2.4 mmHg within a range of 0-55 mmHg. This device has the potential to be used for personalized real-time intraocular pressure monitoring during the daytime.
We present a non-contact and non-invasive gadget towards monitoring intraocular pressure. The pressure -monitoring device is in the form of wearable glasses comprising a laser source, multiple miniaturized lenses and mirrors, a mask for structured illumination of the cornea, and a miniaturized camera. The pressure level is deduced through observing the radius of curvature of the grid pattern on the cornea. We justify our design with analytical modeling, ray tracing and finite element simulations, and experiments on an elastic eye phantom at different tilt angles. The results reveal a pressure measurement resolution of 2.4 mmHg between 0 - 55 mmHg pressure range. The proposed device was further tested on an ex-vivo ovine eye in regards to laser visibility by the camera, at laser safe power levels. With further in-vivo experimentation and development, the proposed gadget could potentially be used in personalized real-time intraocular pressure monitoring during the daytime.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available