4.6 Article

Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

Journal

OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 130, Issue 12, Pages 1248-1257

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.07.024

Keywords

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty; Descemet stripping auto-mated endothelial keratoplasty; Cataract surgery; Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy; Register-based study

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compares the outcomes of different posterior lamellar corneal transplant procedures for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, taking into consideration preoperative patient characteristics. The results show that all three surgical methods improved visual acuity in the majority of patients, but DMEK and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK achieved higher levels of visual acuity after 2 years, and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK had a superior graft survival rate. The choice of surgical method should be personalized, considering not only the corneal condition but also each patient's complete medical status and postoperative medical care.
Purpose: To compare the outcome between posterior lamellar corneal transplant procedures for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, taking preoperative patient characteristics in consideration. Surgical methods compared were Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet stripping automated endo-thelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and DSAEK with concomitant cataract surgery (phacoemulsification plus DSAEK). Design: Registry-based study with propensity score matching. Participants: One thousand six hundred seventy-seven patients from all Swedish corneal transplantation units treated from 2012 through 2019. Methods: All patients undergoing endothelial keratoplasty performed from 2012 through 2019 with completed 2-year follow-up data reported to The Swedish Corneal Transplant Register were included, totaling 1677 patients. Three comparable groups (DMEK, DSAEK, and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK) with 216 patients in each group were generated with propensity score matching based on preoperative visual acuity, age, sex, year of surgery, and preoperative risk factors such as inflammation, vascularization, and glaucoma. Main Outcome Measures: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the 2-year follow-up, frequency of graft dislocation, graft rejection episodes, and graft failure within 2 years including primary graft failure. Results: The preoperative corneal status was affected more severely in the DSAEK group before matching. In the matched groups, the median BCVA 2 years after surgery was 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in both the DMEK and the phacoemulsification plus DSAEK groups and 0.15 logMAR in the DSAEK group (P 1/4 0.001). The frequency of graft dislocation was higher among the patients undergoing phacoemulsification plus DSAEK, but the frequency of graft failure and primary graft failure was higher in the DMEK group. Conclusions: Visual acuity improved in most patients (90%) with all 3 surgical methods. However, DMEK and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK reached higher levels of visual acuity 2 years after surgery, and phaco-emulsification plus DSAEK was superior considering graft survival rate. All 3 surgical procedures showed both strengths and weaknesses, suggesting that the choice of surgical method should be individualized, taking into consideration not only the cornea, but each patient's complete medical status as well as the entire course of postoperative medical care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available