4.7 Article

Experimental investigation of hydrodynamic interaction between a squat submarine operating behind a ship

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 279, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114559

Keywords

Hydrodynamic interaction; Ship submarine interaction; Submarine; Wave; Towing tank test

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article examines the interaction between a squat submarine and a ship in various wave and resistance tests. A series of experiments were conducted using a captive model of the submarine at a scale of 1/10 and a Fridsma ship model. The results show that the drag forces on the submarine increase by up to 41% in the critical zone behind the ship, extending to a depth of 0.75 times the submarine's depth.
This article experimentally investigates the hydrodynamic interaction of a squat submarine operating behind a ship in various wave and resistance tests. A 0.625 m long (one-tenth scale) captive model of a squat submarine is constructed along with a 1.5 m Fridsma ship to perform 47 unique experiments in a 4 x 6 x 400 m3 tank located in a towing tank center. The submarine is a new midget-submersible, of Apam-Napat SMSD type, with an L/D ratio below four. Wave and resistance tests are performed for various 2D relative lengths and depths at short -distance conditions. A wave of 0.1 m height and 1.5 m wavelength is used in the wave tests, and different operational velocities of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 m/s are used in the resistance tests. In each case, drag and heave forces are recorded and presented for the vessels using non-dimensional units. Finally, outputs are extended to develop 2D contours to estimate the interactional forces in the full domain. Results show that the interaction between surface waves creates a critical zone behind the ship around the 0.75D depth where the submarine drag forces are increased by up to 41%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available