Comparing self-reported energy intake using an online dietary tool with energy expenditure by an activity tracker

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare self-reported total energy intake (TEI) collected using an online multiple-pass 24-h dietary recall tool (Intake24) with total energy expenditure (TEE) estimated from Fitbit Charge 2-improved algorithms in adults from the NoHoW trial (12-mo weight maintenance after freeliving weight loss).Methods: Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the level of agreement between TEI and TEE at baseline and after 12 mo. The ratio of TEI to TEE was also calculated.Results: Data from 1323 participants (71% female) was included in the analysis (mean +/- SD: age 45 +/- 12 y, body mass index 29.7 +/- 5.4 kg/m2 , initial weight loss 11.5 +/- 6.5 kg). The TEI was lower than TEE on average by 33%, with limits of agreement ranging from-91% to +25%. Men, younger individuals, those with higher body mass index, those with the greater weight loss before enrollment, and those who gained weight during the study underestimated to a greater extent. Conclusions: These findings contribute to the ongoing research examining the validity of technology-based dietary assessment tools. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Automated summary

The study compared self-reported total energy intake with total energy expenditure estimated from Fitbit Charge 2 algorithms. The results showed that self-reported energy intake was generally lower than energy expenditure, and the degree of underestimation varied among different populations.