4.5 Review

The effectiveness of nurse practitioner care for patients with mental health conditions in primary care settings: A systematic review

Journal

NURSING OUTLOOK
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2023.101995

Keywords

Nurse Practitioners; Mental health; Effectiveness; Primary care

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of nurse practitioners (NPs) in treating patients with anxiety, depression, and substance use disorders in primary care settings. The results show that NP evidence-based care and prescribing are comparable to that of physicians, and NP-led collaborative care is associated with symptom reduction. However, more high-quality evidence is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of NP care for mental health conditions in primary care settings.
Background: The nurse practitioner (NP) workforce is key to meeting the demand for mental health services in primary care settings.Purpose: The purpose of this study is to synthesize the evidence focused on the effectiveness of NP care for patients with mental health conditions in primary care settings, particularly focused on primary care NPs and psychiatric mental health NPs and patients with anxiety, depression, and substance use disorders.Methods: Studies published since 2014 in the United States studying NP care of patients with anxiety, depression, or substance use disorders in primary care settings were included.Findings: Seventeen studies were included. Four high-quality studies showed that NP evidence-based care and prescribing were comparable to that of physicians. Seven low-quality studies suggest that NP-led collaborative care is associated with reduced symptoms.Discussion: More high-quality evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of NP care for patients with mental health conditions in primary care settings.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available