4.7 Article

Quadrupole ion trap with dipolar DC excitation: motivation, nonlinear dynamics, and simple formulas

Journal

NONLINEAR DYNAMICS
Volume 111, Issue 17, Pages 15837-15852

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-023-08706-1

Keywords

Quadrupole ion trap; Dipolar DC excitation; Higher-order averaging; Periodic solutions; Harmonic balance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies the dynamics of a trapped ion in a mass spectrometer under the influence of quadrupolar RF and dipolar DC excitation. By calculating the electrostatic field for realistic geometries, we derive a classical Mathieu equation with a perturbation term and quadratic nonlinearity. We simplify the solution proposed by Plass, include the quadratic term, and develop a second-order averaging-based approximation. The results show that a stable periodic solution can be obtained using a two-frequency approximation, and we quantify the effect of the quadratic nonlinearity.
We study the dynamics of a trapped ion in a mass spectrometer under the action of both the usual quadrupolar RF and dipolar DC excitation. The relevant governing equation, derived from electrostatic field calculations for realistic geometries, is a classical Mathieu equation perturbed with a constant inhomogeneous term and a small quadratic nonlinearity. An early paper by Plass examined the case without the quadratic term using variation of parameters. Here, we note a significantly simpler particular solution than used by Plass, include the quadratic term, and develop a second-order averaging-based approximation. The averaging results show that a particular underlying simple periodic solution is stable. We then show that a two-frequency approximation matches that solution well for practical purposes. Finally, we present and validate an easy iterative calculation for obtaining that two-frequency solution and quantify the effect of the quadratic nonlinearity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available