4.7 Article

A non-destructive electro-acoustic method to characterize the pull-in voltage of electrostatic actuators

Journal

NONLINEAR DYNAMICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-023-08811-1

Keywords

Pull-in; Electrostatic actuator; Micro-speaker; Harmonic distortions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For electrostatic actuators, predicting the pull-in failure mode is crucial. A simple nonlinear lumped parameter model is developed to accurately determine the DC pull-in and quasi-static AC pull-in voltages at different working points. The distortion analysis of harmonic distortions is proposed as a viable route for the non-destructive characterization of electrostatic actuators.
For electrostatic actuators, the pull-in marks an upper limit for the operation range. Once reached, the electrodes come into contact and are shorted without further protection. A non-destructive measurement technique to predict this failure mode is of high interest to allow, e.g. fabrication monitoring or reliability studies. To this end, we develop a surprisingly simple nonlinear lumped parameter model (LPM) for a rather complex electrostatic actuator, designed for an in-ear loudspeaker application. It turns out that a single degree-of-freedom model with only one parameter is sufficient. Our key approach is to experimentally determine this free model parameter by analysing harmonic distortions at low frequencies. Harmonic distortions are a very sensitive tool for nonlinearities. Our method is suggested by simulations with a 2D stationary finite element method (FEM), demonstrating how the analysis of harmonic distortions for voltages far below the pull-in can predict not only the DC pull-in but also the quasi-static AC pull-in voltages at different working points. The distortion analysis of electrostatic actuator ensembles therefore seems a viable route for their non-destructive characterization in the nonlinear domain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available